Change request #1075
Consistently rename `omega` to more descriptive `solidangle`
| Status: | Closed | Start date: | 01/10/2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Low | Due date: | ||
| Assigned To: |  Deil Christoph | % Done: | 100% | |
| Category: | - | |||
| Target version: | 00-08-00 | |||
| Duration: |
Description
This change has been discussed and agreed here:
https://cta-redmine.irap.omp.eu/issues/1061#note-6
The commits are here:
https://github.com/cdeil/gammalib/compare/omega_to_solidangle
https://github.com/cdeil/ctools/compare/omega_to_solidangle
Recurrence
No recurrence.
History
#1
Updated by Deil Christoph almost 11 years ago
There’s still other omega in the code, but I think those are not directly solid angles, but other quantities, so I didn’t touch them:
http://gammalib.sourceforge.net/doxygen/classGCTAModelRadialPolynom.html#ac202f2207e1b8dfc43488f882793d6ff
https://github.com/gammalib/gammalib/search?q=omega0&type=Code
Let me know if something else should be renamed to something more descriptive.
#2
Updated by Knödlseder Jürgen almost 11 years ago
- % Done changed from 0 to 80
Thanks for doing this. I’m about to merge.
I think we should then leave it like this for the 0.8 release.
I still plan to have eventually some interface changes in 0.9 as we certainly will still discover some inconsistencies in the future. But then for 1.0 we put everything under change control.
Now let’s try to get 0.8 out ...
#3
Updated by Deil Christoph almost 11 years ago
- Status changed from Pull request to Resolved
- % Done changed from 80 to 100
#4
Updated by Knödlseder Jürgen almost 11 years ago
- Status changed from Resolved to Closed