Action #1110
Feature #1036: Implement energy resolution
Write a test case
Status: | Closed | Start date: | 12/10/2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Normal | Due date: | ||
Assigned To: | Owen Ellis | % Done: | 100% | |
Category: | - | |||
Target version: | Stage Florent | |||
Duration: |
Recurrence
No recurrence.
History
#1 Updated by Deil Christoph almost 11 years ago
- Status changed from New to In Progress
- Assigned To set to Owen Ellis
#2 Updated by Owen Ellis almost 11 years ago
- % Done changed from 0 to 50
https://github.com/ellisowen/gammalib/tree/action_1105_b
currently a bug in the unit test - I’m working on this at the moment to resolve the issue.
#3 Updated by Knödlseder Jürgen almost 11 years ago
- % Done changed from 50 to 60
On the flight back I implemented the integration in GCTAResponse::nedisp
which does basically the same as your unit test. While doing this I recognized that there were some errors in the function computation, which I corrected. Now the energy dispersion integrated to unity.
I merged in your action_1105_b
, did some minor cosmetic adjustments, and this now also seems to work. So you may close the issue, unless you want to add more testing steps.
I merged the 1036-implement-energy-resolution branch into integration
, as I worked in the meanwhile on the GCaldb
class, and this led to a divergence of the code. So CTA energy dispersion is now implemented in GammaLib!
Still needs some testing, but at least everything compiles and all unit tests are okay.
#4 Updated by Deil Christoph almost 11 years ago
- Status changed from In Progress to Resolved
- % Done changed from 60 to 100
#5 Updated by Knödlseder Jürgen almost 11 years ago
- Status changed from Resolved to Feedback
#6 Updated by Knödlseder Jürgen over 10 years ago
- Target version deleted (
2nd coding sprint)
#7 Updated by Knödlseder Jürgen about 10 years ago
- Status changed from Feedback to Closed
- Remaining (hours) set to 0.0
#8 Updated by Knödlseder Jürgen over 9 years ago
- Target version set to Stage Florent