Bug #1528

Missing python interface of GCTAResponseIrf::hi/lo_save_thres

Added by Mayer Michael about 9 years ago. Updated about 9 years ago.

Status:ClosedStart date:09/24/2015
Priority:HighDue date:
Assigned To:Knödlseder Jürgen% Done:

100%

Category:-
Target version:1.0.0
Duration:

Description

It seems we forgot to add the python interface for the above functions into the file GCTAResponseIrf.i
The following two lines should be added:

    const double&         lo_save_thres(void) const;
    const double&         hi_save_thres(void) const;

In general, I think we should check this for all available (public) functions before 1.0 release, right?


Recurrence

No recurrence.

History

#1 Updated by Mayer Michael about 9 years ago

  • Description updated (diff)

#2 Updated by Knödlseder Jürgen about 9 years ago

Agree. Normally I’m doing the checks but this probably escaped detected.

#3 Updated by Knödlseder Jürgen about 9 years ago

  • Status changed from New to Closed
  • Assigned To set to Knödlseder Jürgen
  • % Done changed from 0 to 100

Merged into devel.

Also available in: Atom PDF