Change request #2461
Improve accuracy of response computation for stacked analysis
Status: | New | Start date: | 04/26/2018 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Priority: | High | Due date: | ||
Assigned To: | - | % Done: | 0% | |
Category: | - | |||
Target version: | - | |||
Duration: |
Description
The response computation in GCTAResponseCube
for a stacked analysis is making a number of assumption, for example that the exposure and energy dispersion do not vary significantly over the size of the point spread function. These assumptions may be violated in some cases. It should be carefully checked how accurate the response computation actually is, and if inaccuracies occur, the precision of the response computation should be improved.
GCTAResponseCube::irf_radial
: exposure does not vary significantly over PSFGCTAResponseCube::irf_radial
: energy dispersion does not vary significantly over PSFGCTAResponseCube::irf_radial
: compute PSF at observed instead of true valuesGCTAResponseCube::irf_elliptical
: exposure does not vary significantly over PSFGCTAResponseCube::irf_elliptical
: energy dispersion does not vary significantly over PSFGCTAResponseCube:: irf_elliptical
: compute PSF at observed instead of true valuesGCTACubeSourceDiffuse::set
: exposure does not vary significantly over PSF and energy dispersionGCTACubeSourceDiffuse::set
: compute PSF at observed instead of true valuesGCTAResponseCube::irf_diffuse
: energy dispersion does not vary significantly over PSF
Recurrence
No recurrence.
History
#1 Updated by Knödlseder Jürgen about 6 years ago
Here a list of the assumptions that are made:
GCTAResponseCube::irf_radial
: observed event direction used to evaluate the exposure, the PSF and the energy dispersion.GCTAResponseCube::irf_elliptical
: observed event direction used to evaluate the exposure, the PSF and the energy dispersion.GCTAResponseCube::irf_diffuse
: observed event direction used to evaluate the energy dispersion.GCTACubeSourceDiffuse::set
: observed event direction and energy used to evaluate the exposure and the PSF.
For a point source the computations are correct.
The diffuse source caching should not be needed anymore since the caching is now done at the GCTAResponse::irf
level (see #2715). Accordingly the caching should be removed. I created issue #2722 for that.