Bug #3440
Make sure that the spatial model value or normalisation is always taken correctly into account
| Status: | Closed | Start date: | 11/07/2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Normal | Due date: | ||
| Assigned To: |  Knödlseder Jürgen | % Done: | 100% | |
| Category: | - | |||
| Target version: | 2.0.0 | |||
| Duration: |
Description
It seems that the spatial model value is not always taken into account, for example when simulation photons from a diffuse cube model.
All spatial model methods should be checked to verify that the spatial model value is correctly taken into account. The same holds for the GSkyModel::flux() and GSkyModel::eflux() methods.
Recurrence
No recurrence.
Related issues
History
#1
Updated by Knödlseder Jürgen over 3 years ago
- Related to Action #3439: Add GSkyModel::flux() method that returns correct flux for diffuse cube models added
#2
Updated by Knödlseder Jürgen about 2 years ago
- Status changed from New to In Progress
- Assigned To set to Knödlseder Jürgen
- % Done changed from 0 to 50
I checked the following models by inspecting the code:
GModelSpatialDiffuseConstGModelSpatialDiffuseCubeGModelSpatialDiffuseMap
GModelSpatialEllipticalDiskGModelSpatialEllipticalGaussGModelSpatialEllipticalGeneralGaussGModelSpatialPointSourceGModelSpatialRadialDiskGModelSpatialRadialGaussGModelSpatialRadialGeneralGaussGModelSpatialRadialProfileDMBurkertGModelSpatialRadialProfileDMEinastoGModelSpatialRadialProfileDMZhaoGModelSpatialRadialProfileGaussGModelSpatialRadialRingGModelSpatialRadialShell
#3
Updated by Knödlseder Jürgen about 2 years ago
- Status changed from In Progress to Closed
- % Done changed from 50 to 100