Action #834

Feature #833: Add functions to public Gammalib API

Decide on naming convention for functions and how to expose them in C++ (namespace or prefix)

Added by Knödlseder Jürgen over 13 years ago. Updated over 13 years ago.

Status:ClosedStart date:04/12/2013
Priority:NormalDue date:
Assigned To:-% Done:

100%

Category:-
Target version:00-08-00
Duration:

Recurrence

No recurrence.

History

#1 Updated by Knödlseder Jürgen over 13 years ago

  • Target version set to 00-08-00

#2 Updated by Knödlseder Jürgen over 13 years ago

gamma seems not to be a possible namespace:

../../include/GTools.hpp:37: error: 'namespace gamma { }' redeclared as different kind of symbol
/usr/include/architecture/i386/math.h:602: error: previous declaration of 'double gamma(double)'

See for example: http://gcc.1065356.n5.nabble.com/Bug-libstdc-49762-New-symbols-not-kept-in-std-namespace-td301112.html

I guess we cannot use gamma :(

#3 Updated by Knödlseder Jürgen over 13 years ago

Here a couple of alternatives to gamma:

gammalib
gamlib
glib
gamlb
gam
gal
glb
I guess I prefer gammalib at the end as it’s explicit, probably rather unique. Drawback: it’s rather long.

#4 Updated by Deil Christoph over 13 years ago

+1 for explicit gammalib

#6 Updated by Knödlseder Jürgen over 13 years ago

  • % Done changed from 0 to 20

Christoph Deil wrote:

+1 for explicit gammalib

Okay, so let’s go with this.

I’ll start implementing the gammalib namespace for the GTools constants first.

#7 Updated by Knödlseder Jürgen over 13 years ago

  • Status changed from New to Closed
  • % Done changed from 20 to 100
  • Remaining (hours) set to 0.0

Use gammalib namespace.

Also available in: Atom PDF