Action #773
Feature #692: Perform an extensive interface review of all classes
Review model module classes
Status: | Closed | Start date: | 02/20/2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Normal | Due date: | ||
Assigned To: | Knödlseder Jürgen | % Done: | 100% | |
Category: | - | Estimated time: | 20.00 hours | |
Target version: | 00-08-00 | |||
Duration: |
Recurrence
No recurrence.
Related issues
History
#1 Updated by Knödlseder Jürgen almost 12 years ago
Class | Comment | ||||||||||||
GModels |
Derive from GContainer , implement container methods. |
||||||||||||
GModelPar |
Revise interface completely, add autoscale() method, assure non-zero scale factor. |
||||||||||||
GModel |
Return name by const reference | ||||||||||||
GModelSky |
value and gradients take GPhoton as argument, inline declarations, improved documentation |
||||||||||||
GModelSpatial |
Add autoscale() method, pass GPhoton to eval and eval_gradients methods, and GEnergy and GTime to mc method, inline declarations |
||||||||||||
GModelSpatialDiffuse |
Pass GPhoton to eval and eval_gradients methods, and GEnergy and GTime to mc method |
||||||||||||
GModelSpatialDiffuseConst |
Pass GPhoton to eval and eval_gradients methods, and GEnergy and GTime to mc method, inline declarations |
||||||||||||
GModelSpatialDiffuseCube |
Pass GPhoton to eval and eval_gradients methods, and GEnergy and GTime to mc method, inline declarations |
||||||||||||
GModelSpatialDiffuseMap |
Pass GPhoton to eval and eval_gradients methods, and GEnergy and GTime to mc method, inline declarations |
||||||||||||
GModelSpatialElliptical |
Pass GEnergy and GTime to eval , eval_gradients and mc methods, inline declarations |
|
GModelSpatialEllipticalDisk |
Pass GEnergy and GTime to eval , eval_gradients and mc methods, inline declarations |
|
GModelSpatialPointSource |
Pass GPhoton to eval and eval_gradients methods, and GEnergy and GTime to mc method |
||||||
GModelSpatialRadial |
Pass GEnergy and GTime to eval , eval_gradients and mc methods, inline declarations |
|
GModelSpatialRadialDisk |
Pass GEnergy and GTime to eval , eval_gradients and mc methods, inline declarations |
|
GModelSpatialRadialGauss |
Pass GEnergy and GTime to eval , eval_gradients and mc methods, inline declarations |
|
GModelSpatialRadialShell |
Pass GEnergy and GTime to eval , eval_gradients and mc methods, inline declarations |
|
GModelSpectral |
Add autoscale() method, add time argument to eval , eval_gradients and mc methods, remove const from eval_gradients |
GModelSpectralConst |
Add time argument to eval , eval_gradients and mc methods, remove const from eval_gradients , add value constructor and access methods, rename norm to value |
||||||||||||
GModelSpectralExpPlaw |
Remove autoscale() method, auto-scale in parameter constructor, complete value constructor, add time argument to eval , eval_gradients and mc methods, remove const from eval_gradients , implement parameter access methods (inline), add pre computation cache for eval and eval_gradients methods, rename norm to prefactor and ecut to cutoff |
||||||||||||
GModelSpectralFunc |
Complete value constructor, add time argument to eval , eval_gradients and mc methods, remove const from eval_gradients , implement parameter access methods (inline) |
||||||||||||
GModelSpectralPlaw |
Remove autoscale() method, auto-scale in parameter constructor, complete value constructor, add time argument to eval , eval_gradients and mc methods, remove const from eval_gradients , implement parameter access methods (inline), rename norm to prefactor |
||||||||||||
GModelSpectralPlaw2 |
Complete value constructor, add time argument to eval , eval_gradients and mc methods, remove const from eval_gradients , implement parameter access methods (inline), emin() and emax() methods now return / take GEnergy |
||||||||||||
GModelSpectralNodes |
Add time argument to eval , eval_gradients and mc methods, remove const from eval_gradients , implement parameter access methods and node manipulation methods |
||||||||||||
GModelSpectralLogParabola |
Remove autoscale() method, auto-scale in parameter constructor, complete value constructor, add time argument to eval , eval_gradients and mc methods, remove const from eval_gradients , implement parameter access methods (inline), pivot() methods now return / take GEnergy , rename norm to prefactor |
||||||||||||
GModelTemporal |
Remove const from eval_gradients |
||||||||||||
GModelTemporalConst |
Add value contructor, remove const from eval_gradients , implement parameter access methods (inline) |
||||||||||||
GModelData |
Nothing | ||||||||||||
GModelRegistry |
size method inline |
||||||||||||
GModelSpatialRegistry |
size method inline |
||||||||||||
GModelSpectralRegistry |
size method inline |
||||||||||||
GModelTemporalRegistry |
size method inline |
#2 Updated by Knödlseder Jürgen almost 12 years ago
- Status changed from New to In Progress
- Assigned To set to Knödlseder Jürgen
- % Done changed from 0 to 10
#3 Updated by Knödlseder Jürgen almost 12 years ago
- Remaining (hours) changed from 20.0 to 16.0
#4 Updated by Knödlseder Jürgen almost 12 years ago
- Remaining (hours) changed from 16.0 to 15.0
The GModels class access operator now returns models by reference instead of returning pointers.
#5 Updated by Knödlseder Jürgen almost 12 years ago
Jürgen Knödlseder wrote:
The GModels class access operator now returns models by reference instead of returning pointers.
I just recognized that this was stupid. I reintroduced the code slicing problem. Instead, all container classes holding pointers of base classes should have pointer access operators! See #517.
#6 Updated by Knödlseder Jürgen almost 12 years ago
The GModels
method should have a hasmodel()
method that checks whether a model with a specific name is present in the container. The method should be inspired from the GPars::haspar()
method.
In general, container classes that allow access by name should have a hasXXX method to check whether a specific named object is present.
#7 Updated by Knödlseder Jürgen almost 12 years ago
A generic autoscale()
method should be added to a model components. The purpose of the autoscale()
method is to set the scale factors to the real value and the value to 1, so that all model parameters are scaled using their actual values.
The best is to add an autoscale()
method at the GModelPar
level, so that each parameter can be autoscaled.
#8 Updated by Knödlseder Jürgen almost 12 years ago
- % Done changed from 10 to 20
Jürgen Knödlseder wrote:
A generic
autoscale()
method should be added to a model components. The purpose of theautoscale()
method is to set the scale factors to the real value and the value to 1, so that all model parameters are scaled using their actual values.The best is to add an
autoscale()
method at theGModelPar
level, so that each parameter can be autoscaled.
An autoscale()
method has been added to GModelPar
and to the GModelSpatial
, GModelSpectral
and GModelTemporal
classes. This method should be called systematically in the parameter constructors.
#9 Updated by Knödlseder Jürgen almost 12 years ago
- % Done changed from 20 to 50
- Remaining (hours) changed from 15.0 to 10.0
The GModelPar
interface has been fully revised. This impacted many of the model classes.
The modification has been tested, and ctools compliance checked. Now the road is paved towards a review of all other interfaces.
#10 Updated by Knödlseder Jürgen almost 12 years ago
I just recognized a major problem with the GModelSpatialDiffuseCube
class: this class does not only represent a spatial model, but a spatio-spectral model. As GModelSpatialDiffuseCube
has the interface of a spatial model only, it does not allow energy dependent model evaluation. In fact, GModelSpatialDiffuseCube
is not a component of a fully factorized model, it is the first example of a non-factorized model.
How to deal with that? Change the class inheritance scheme where GModelSky
is only the base class and then we have derived classes for factorized or other model types? Or making GModelSky
deal with all model types?
Or should we treat GModelSpatialDiffuseCube
as a special case, because it is a spatio-spectral model but coexists with a spectral model in the Fermi-LAT XML interface?
The problem occurs in the response computation, which explicitly uses the spatial model’s eval
method with the sky direction as single parameter for model computation. The source energy is available at this point, so it could be used for computation.
It is interesting to recognized that the GModelSky::spatial
method does not really relies on the fact that the model is factorized, except for the fact that the gradients need the correct pre-factors. This means that the irf
method could in fact return the full response, and not only that of the spatial component.
The entire interfaces were in fact thought for a factorized sky model, and now we have a clear example for a non-factorized sky model.
A created action #808 to rethink the interface for non-factorized sky models.
#11 Updated by Knödlseder Jürgen almost 12 years ago
- % Done changed from 50 to 70
Finished the spatial classes.
#12 Updated by Knödlseder Jürgen over 11 years ago
Jürgen Knödlseder wrote:
The
GModels
method should have ahasmodel()
method that checks whether a model with a specific name is present in the container. The method should be inspired from theGPars::haspar()
method.In general, container classes that allow access by name should have a hasXXX method to check whether a specific named object is present.
Done!
#13 Updated by Knödlseder Jürgen over 11 years ago
- Status changed from In Progress to Feedback
- % Done changed from 70 to 100
- Remaining (hours) changed from 10.0 to 0.0
The model class review is now finished.
#14 Updated by Knödlseder Jürgen about 11 years ago
- Status changed from Feedback to Closed